Wow. I just finished reading this piece of short fiction ("A Private Landscape" by Melissa Pritchard) and all I want to do is talk to someone about it--which, for me, is a sign that this is an excellent piece of literature. I guess this blog will have to do.
It felt like every single line worked tirelessly to give the reader an understanding of the protagonist and her surroundings. God, it's fabulous. This writing is fabulous. I want more than anything to be able to produce this type of writing someday. Okay, so the plot is that basically this woman feels totally old, useless, and unneeded by her husband and only daughter. Her daughter is starting to "come of age" (as we say in the literary world) and her husband is confused by seeing his wife diminish while his daughter blossoms in her sexuality. For her daughter's fourteenth birthday, the narrator picks out a white horse with a gray underbelly (like the moon) to give to her. Through the descriptions of the horse, how it is treated, and what it means, we get a better understanding of the protagonist's inner thoughts. She narrates "The horse, sapped by domesticity, confined by fences, has disillusioned me. I expected more from it" (131). Clearly (and this is the author's amazing ability shining through) the narrator is "talking" about the horse, but she is thinking about her own life. She is disillusioned by the ideas of marriage and family. The text is flawless in its use of different layers of meaning. Pritchard does this so fluidly that while reading this piece, I was aware of my jaw dropping--staring open mouthed--at the pages. God, I want to do that. This is seriously, like, the best thing I've read in a long time.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Reading "Lust" by Susan Minot
Oh my gosh, this is such an awesome piece of fiction. What Minot basically does is, in tons of little and extraordinarily vivid snapshots, chronicles the desperation and emptiness that one woman feels after carrying on countless lustful encounters with different guys. Throughout the story (if you can call it that, because it reads more like an essay), snippets of strict exposition give us an idea of what is going on internally while her "body" does its thing. The reason I use the word "body" is that she, early on in the text, describes herself in this way: "he got up again to close the door, then came back to me, a body waiting on the rug" (218). These portions of exposition are typically written in the second person. I thought it was interesting that the narrator could explicitly describe her sexual encounters with the pronoun "I," but then, when she started talking about the feeling of emptiness that comes with them, she had to switch it to "you." This is a subtle, but powerful technique. Another thing that I found interesting is that she referred to the guys she messes around with as "boys." Not men, not guys, but boys. This gives them a certain immaturity in a really subtle and implicit way. Awesome writing.
Nancy Mairs "On Being a Cripple"
I really have respect for Nancy Mairs. This woman, pardon my French, has gohones. In this essay, she paints a real portrait of who she is now, living with a debilitating disease. With painful, embarrassing truth and comedic relief, she unblinkingly tells it like it is. I think the introduction to this essay is particularly poignant because Mairs begins the essay with an antedote about falling in a public restroom. Along with this, there are certain other detail that make the essay seem really honest.
I love the line, "One may also lose one's sense of humor. That's the easiest to lose and the hardest to survive without" (91). She uses other powerful techniques such as when she makes an interesting list of what/who she "is." Along with being a writing teacher and a "superb, if messy, cook," she also can "do italic writing and, in an emergency, bathe an oil-soaked cat." These details are effective because they give us a good idea about the kind of person this woman is--about what is important to her. It's really a fantastic essay. If you haven't read it yet, you should.
I love the line, "One may also lose one's sense of humor. That's the easiest to lose and the hardest to survive without" (91). She uses other powerful techniques such as when she makes an interesting list of what/who she "is." Along with being a writing teacher and a "superb, if messy, cook," she also can "do italic writing and, in an emergency, bathe an oil-soaked cat." These details are effective because they give us a good idea about the kind of person this woman is--about what is important to her. It's really a fantastic essay. If you haven't read it yet, you should.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)